'Detestable episode' - C4 slams punishment of whistleblower judge

 

The Center to Combat Corruption and Cronyism (C4) has lambasted the suspension of judge Hamid Sultan Abu Backer until retirement following his affidavit alleging judicial misconduct.

C4 viewed this verdict with concern as future whistleblowers will now be less likely to come forward for fear of punishment. This suspension also effectively ends Hamid Sultan’s judicial career.

"It is also of major concern that Judge Hamid was not allowed the right to be heard at the Judges’ Ethics Committee (JEC) proceedings which determined his suspension, as they continued without his presence.

"This is despite his lawyer requesting an adjournment due to his ill-health and his hearing with the Court of Appeal on Friday.

"According to the rules of natural justice, every litigant must be given the right to be heard. This right was overlooked by the JEC and not afforded to Judge Hamid," said C4 in a statement today.

Hamid Sultan, who had made allegations of judicial misconduct, was suspended by the JEC until Aug 27 when he is due to retire.

In February 2019, Hamid had filed an affidavit claiming abuses and fraud in the judiciary. A substantial part of the affidavit has since been expunged.

The then Pakatan Harapan government had considered setting up a royal commission of inquiry (RCI) to investigate the claims, but then attorney-general Tommy Thomas said this did not materialise due to objections by judges.

Remarking on the case, C4 said what stands out in the whole process was how inadequately Hamid Sultan, a whistleblower, was protected.

"Never before in our country’s history has a sitting judge so openly called out potential misconduct within the judiciary.

"Judge Hamid must have known that there would be backlash, but the sheer lack of support or protection for this act of whistleblowing is astounding.

"His courage in calling out judicial misconduct amounting to potential corruption among judges has been used to punish him and be made an example of to others who may do the same," said the corruption watchdog, calling it a detestable episode.

It said it was also clear that the Whistleblower Protection Act 2010 is essentially toothless in its overriding purpose to protect whistleblowers, as it does not cover these circumstances.

"With this verdict, C4 demands answers as to what will become of Judge Hamid’s serious revelations.

"During the Harapan government, an establishment of the RCI was promised to investigate the allegations. There has been complete inaction from the current government on this.

"Recent statements by Thomas reveal that such an investigation was not welcome to numerous judges, both serving and retired, and as such, this issue was pushed to the background," it said.

C4 demanded that there be no further delays in investigating the purported abuses.

"It is unthinkable that allegations of such severity can be quietly left to be forgotten and eventually swept under the rug.

"The judiciary is a fundamental cornerstone of our democracy and all efforts must be taken to defend its integrity and independence.

"C4 also calls for Judge Hamid to be granted his right to be heard. Furthermore, the judiciary must clarify its stance on whistleblowing to ensure that potential whistleblowers are not undeterred, even if it appears to be an attempt at scandalising the sanctity of the institution.

"Punitive action ought to be exercised only when investigations show mala fide or ill intentions," it concluded. - Mkini

✍ Credit given to the original owner of this post : ☕ Malaysians Must Know the TRUTH

🌐 Hit This Link To Find Out More On Their Articles...🏄🏻‍♀️ Enjoy Surfing!