Fraser Anning's Statement : Muslims Should Avoid Kafir Countries

Recall I said that Muslims should avoid kafir countries?  Well here is Al Jazeera with an article listing out an increasing number of attacks against Muslims in the West :

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019/03/summary-attacks-muslims-western-countries-190316150024125.html

What I said (or meant) in the earlier post has been repeated by that Aussie red neck Senator Fraser Anning. Here is his statement in full.

 

In reply to Anning our Economics Minister Azmin Ali has written a short and rather simple statement.  

How come our Foreign Minister has not said anything?

Here is Azmin's statement : 

Over among the UMNOs the Khairy fellow has called Anning 'a piece of shit'.  That is UMNO's official reply ?? 

Well why not?  After kepala bapak and haramjadah,   'a piece of shit' is perhaps a progression. 

Maybe after this Khairy can use words like 'muther f____r".  
Dont forget to use the UMNO letterhead.  
Or is it the UMNO d_ _k head now?

Lets analyse that Fraser Anning statement a little.

 

Anning lives inside his own cocoon. There are people like this all over the world - sadly still in sufficient quantity. Anning's attitude is no different from the shooter and the three other murderous culprits who have been arrested.

 

One paragraph in Anning's statement sticks out and it reflects exactly what I said earlier : Muslims should avoid the kafir countries.  

 

Anning deems 'all' Muslims as fanatics. Muslims will certainly not agree but that is how Anning sees it. However you look at it or whatever you wish to say about this,  this is a very serious clash of cultures.  

The modern, western versus the 11th century arabian.  
That is all there is to it. 

Both sides will debate who is right or wrong.
Whichever side it is, both of them cannot co-exist at the same time and place. 
Ultimately one has to give way to the other. 
It has to be a zero sum game.

When any group is small and less organised amidst a larger and completely different or divergent group that is more organised, the small group will stick to itself and the larger group will "tolerate" the smaller as a 'novelty',  a  'curiosity' etc.

But when the smaller group begins to get bigger and also becomes more organised, and is still 'totally different', divergent from the larger group, it will be no more a 'novelty' or a 'curiosity'.   

All its peculiarities and differences will now appear to be 'at odds'  with the larger group.  The larger group will also appear more 'at odds' to the emerging group. 

This is what is happening between the Muslims and their host societies all over the western world or what I term the Kafir Countries.

Be it Australia, UK, US, Europe etc.

Now the peace, harmony and safety of the Muslims in these Kafir Countries will depend entirely on the degree of civilisation  and social advancement of the host societies.  

Some people call it 'tolerance' - which is actually not a nice word.   However this  'tolerance' is very easily achieved. Just write it into the laws of the countries. Which they have done. Freedom of religion, freedom of expression, freedom of this, freedom of that etc. It is all good.  The Police will really protect you, regardless of what ethnicity or religion you belong to.


But instead of 'tolerance' the better word should be 'respect'.  
The problem with respect is that it always must be earned. 
You should NEVER command respect.  
Correction : You can never command respect.
You cannot write 'respect' into the laws.t 

Respect can be deemed as 'what people really think of you'.  This can be more complicated, especially when the differences are very great.  This is what people say about other people in the privacy of their homes, the insulting "private" jokes they may share among themselves about others etc.  

This applies to all people who are diverse from each other.  

The level of education, civilisation and degree of social finesse in that society may keep these thoughts private. But once in a while it does spill out in the streets.  The shooting in New Zealand and the statement by Fraser Anning are but manifestations.

The real problem, the very serious problem is the degree of the divergence or the degree of deviation of one culture from the next.  Between the smaller group and the larger group - sharing the same neighborhoods.  

The modern civilisations are now way beyond modern and even beyond post modern. They believe in same sex marriages. For Muslims these are still 'stone them to death' crimes.  Muslims do not consider same sex marriages as being 'modern' at all.

The Muslims are ok with marrying children. Especially the Middle Eastern types.  Most modern folks deem this a crime. I am certain that in New Zealand a Muslim cannot legally marry a 12 year old girl. But that does not mean that they will 'erase' this type of belief from their religious teachings. Again one religion's "modern' maybe  backwardness to another religion.  So who is who?

The Muslims are incessant with their religious classification of us versus the kafirs. That everyone else is a kafir. Its all about kafir, kafir, kafir.   Modern societies have overcome religious labelling. If not, in their reckoning they are not considered modern societies.

So the points of divergence are great. Whatever their numbers (quite a few, many, plenty, numerous, etc) the differences are simply too great.  

As the numbers of Muslims and non Muslims (in the Kafir countries)  increases - along with their proximities, the requirement for 'tolerance' will increase substantially. Exponentially. As I said the 'tolerance' part is easy - just write it into the laws. 

The question that is more difficult to answer is the 'respect' part. What will people say about each other inside their private homes and within their private zones? What will the Muslims say about their new societies and what will those societies say about the new Musllims - in private and among themselves?  Because that is where the respect is established or not established. 

There was obviously no more respect at all in New Zealand, a few days ago. 
And also in that statement by Fraser Anning.  
Hence tolerance broke down - murderously. 

My advice is Muslims should avoid the Kafir countries. Do not go and live there. WHY? Because the divergences are too great.  There may not be much respect (to begin with) and eventually the tolerance will break down. 

I foresee more of this type of blow ups in the future.   It will become more risky.  Quebec, Norway, 

It is much better to stay in your own countries and develop your own countries to a level equal or better than the kafir countries.  Perhaps then there will be more respect.  

Remember this : tolerance is easy. 
Respect is more difficult. 
And it cuts both ways. 

Seems to be breaking down. 
Better be safe than sorry.

✍ Sumber Pautan : ☕ Malaysians Must Know the TRUTH

Kredit kepada pemilik laman asal dan sekira berminat untuk meneruskan bacaan sila klik link atau copy paste ke web server : https://ift.tt/2Tbc8xG

(✿◠‿◠)✌ Mukah Pages : Pautan Viral Media Sensasi Tanpa Henti. Memuat-naik beraneka jenis artikel menarik setiap detik tanpa henti dari pelbagai sumber. Selamat membaca dan jangan lupa untuk 👍 Like & 💕 Share di media sosial anda!